Nine Images of Models at the Field Museum
Models
What is a
model? In the context I am working with, the context of Natural History, a
model is an object made by human beings (and therefore not a specimen taken
from nature) that is made for the purpose that would be served by a specimen.
That is: an object made by man to take the place of a specimen where a specimen
does not (or cannot) exist. In most cases, species are shown in natural History
Museums by displaying their preserved bodies, parts of their bodies, or fossils
of parts of their bodies. Mostly this is done in the form of taxidermy, where
the skin of an animal is preserved and placed over a form that mimics the
animal in life. Taxidermy mounts are the skins of dead animals made to look
like they are alive, something that is achieved with the pose of the figure and
realistic glass eyes. Other animals, such as extinct species like the Giant
Irish Elk, may be displayed by showing fossils of their skeletons. No acual
body part remains, since the bone has since been replaced with stone, but fossils
still lack the human hand. The may be excavated, cleaned, and organized by men,
but they are not created by them, and are true reflections of the forms of the
bones.
Models are
not this way. Models are made by human beings as a standin for specimens.
Models are often shown in Natural History Museums as if they were actually specimens of species. Often this is done
if the species is unavailable, and the model is created as a sort of ‘artist’s
recreation’ of what an exinct species most possibly looked like, such as in the
case with the Indricoderium. Because this species is extininct, and taxidermy
is impossible, the museum has created a life size model to show people what
they believe it looked like, based on fossilized evidence and studying it’s
closest relative, the rhinoceros. Another similar example is the recreation of
the face of the
boy inside mummy #111517
. This recreation was done with the aid of CT
scans and 3d imaging of a mummified specimen in the museum collection. Using
this technology, the sculptor can recreate with some amount of accuracy, what
this person looked like in life. These two examples should show you that there
is some amount of accuracy in creating models, but there is always that gap
between what something actually looked like and how man recreated it. For
example, we deduced that the indricoderium had thick gray skin because of it’s
close relation to the rhinoceros, but we do not actually know this, and thus,
the model could be inaccurate in color. This applies to all aspects of models
that attempt to recreate for display what we cannot see directly.
And just to
make this a bit more complicated, I wanted to point out that taxidermy itself
is not free from these problems. Take the example of the Helmet Shrike.
Although bird skin may be preserved, it will shrink and wrinkle in the drying
process. Covered in feathers this is not a problem, but in the case of birds
with exposed skin, like the Helmet Shrikes wattle the skin will dry in a way
that does not show how it looks in real life. Because of this, if the bird is
preserved as a taxidermy mount, the taxidermist would recreate the waddle using
clay and paint. This is just one example of the many ways that taxidermy is reliant
on the skill and knowledge of the taxidermist in order to be accurate. Many old
specimens at the field Museum are not accurate the species (inaccurate body
forms, wrongly colored beaks etc) caused either by a less skilled taxidermist
or a lack of knowledge at the time of what the animal looked like in life.
-IR
No comments:
Post a Comment