In the zoo’s public mission
Hornaday, Blair, and Osborn as leaders of the Bronx Zoo pushed for Wildlife
Protection, Educational. Scientific Fields, Conservation (of natural resources
such as, forests, grass, soil . . .etc.). In terms of design Osborn instituted
changes by luring the public back to conservation, along with how our use of
our limited natural resources will affect the future of wildlife that living
within those natural environments. The pros of the African Plains was that in
the 1940s they received anonymous funding from a benefactor who was the
department store owner of Marshall Field, the zoo was more realistic having
native plants for the animals, consisted of a more detailed and informative
descriptions for the visitors to read before or while watching the animals at
the zoo. The cons were that the human visitors continued to be placed outside
the scene. They were still separated from the naturalistic landscape looking
out and into a stage set. Hancocks praised the Bronx Zoo because of the fact
that the zoo precipitated a revolution on its home ground, setting the stage
for a remarkable run during the past thirty years of new exhibits and the
consistency in setting the highest standards for all their exhibits.
The major innovations that were
introduced at the Seattle’s Woodland Park Zoo was the fact that they were the
first to ever take priority on animals over visitors, clients, or workers at
the park. What made Seattle’s Woodland Park Zoo different from other was the
fact that they classified each animal based on the environment that they lived
such as by the temperature, precipitation, and habitats . . . etc. The radical departure that zoo’s
committed to the “landscape immersion approach” was the departure from
conventional zoo design because it reflected a pronounced shift in philosophy
from the homocentric to the biocentric view, and noted what Joe Coe, one of the
planning team members, explains as the basic conservation approach that says we
just live here, we don’t own the earth, the owns us. The new approach allowed
the viewer to become physically and psychologically immersed in the stimulated
created habitat.
Wilson implies that visitors at the
zoos prefer watching an animal that is living naturally like it would in the
wild, rather than staring at an animal in a cage doing nothing. Wilson states
that a zoo incorporates natural elements such as trees, plants, temperature, soil,
and many other wildlife elements where the animal originates. This then
initially then gives the visitors at the zoos an opportunity to actually
experience, embrace, and learn by observing how the animal lives in the wild.
No comments:
Post a Comment