Monday, September 24, 2012

Response Questions 2 WEEK-2


Through Linnaeus’s taxonomic method of classifying organisms, the British zoos then began to collect all different types of animals located from different parts of the world and then had them shipped to the zoo so that the public can experience and learn about animals from different parts of the world all in one location. The notion of “stamp collecting” was perceived by the public as the government wasting taxpayer dollars on these zoos that took care of these animals according to the Ark in the Park, but later was evident that the public was wrong because some of these animals were endangered which meant that they were worth a lot of money, and since they were many people came to see these animals which brought the community a lot of revenue. As well as by sustaining these endangered species and for the zoo to breed more of these animals that were endangered their zoos became more profitable. And their assets of their zoo doubled and tripled. For example, the zoos would have two endangered species that were worth $1,500, and then they would breed the two animals that were endangered, then they would give four offspring’s, which made their park an additional $6,000. And there were times when zoo’s would sell some of these animals after taking care of them within the zoo and would charge them more than what they were really worth. The reason why stamp collecting in context of zoos is that there were problematic because there were cases where some of these animals were uninhabitable within their environment, so the zoos (such as the early British Zoos) had to create an artificial environment such as an indoor environment with heating which was expensive and costly.

The wealthy during this time was trying to collect as many animals as they could for their zoos, because during this time you were perceived wealthier based on the amount of animals that you collected throughout the world; especially the animals that were not “fit geographically” within that environment. Which once they shipped these animals for collection they had to build artificial indoor environments for these exotic animals that were from other parts of the world. They believed that by collecting some of these exotic endangered animals they were helping some of these animals by collecting them, but in actuality they were domesticating them and having them “trained” to rely on humans when these endangered wild animals should have never been taken away from their natural environment in the first place. For example when animal collectors would capture a jaguar from Africa, they would then place that jaguar within their zoo, but after a decade or two, the jaguar would then rely on the humans to feed the animal with food, rather than the jaguar hunting a live animal for its survival. Then once the zoo decides to free the jaguar back into the wild it will die, if not the offspring’s that were born within the zoo from the jaguar will die once they are released back into the wild. The reason is jaguars are meant to be in the wild, hunting for food, but once they are taken away from their natural habitat regardless of whether they are endangered from poachers or pollution form industrialization, they will ultimately lose their natural instinct and will become reliant on humanity. Ultimately the result is that “stamp collecting” and these greedy wealthy people did not think about the bigger picture on how catastrophic their actions would soon cause within nature. They thought that by installing these zoological gardens they were collecting and saving endangered animals but in reality they were the ones who were actually contributing towards the extinction of the endangered animals by extracting the exotic animals from their natural environment, and placing them in a “zoological garden within their zoo and domesticating them by feeding them, and training them to become reliant upon humans to providing them with food. When really the animals themselves were already are self-sustainable, until these greedy wealthy people wanted to collect these innocent animals and destroy the very fabric of our world. The wealthy wanted to be known as wealthy by collecting the most amounts of animals, exotic animals, endangered animals, and animals from different parts of the world not thinking about how it would affect every individual in this world in the long run. Because once these animals are later released back into the wild such as the jaguars into Africa they will not know how to hunt for food and later would become extinct and based on their extinction then the animals that relied on consuming the jaguars will become extinct as well. And the animals that the jaguars relied upon hunting will then become overpopulated and then there would be a chaotic trickle affect within the food chain of the natural world, which then will later on somehow affect us the human society eventually in negative or positive way.



According to John Berger we looked at animals because in the past they have served as a necessity such as horses were used has a way of travel since cars were not invented, cattle were raised to provide us with food, dogs were used for hunting animals in the wild because of their strong natural ability for scent, as well as many other animals served as a necessity in the past. But now in the present many of these things animals are useless now because we have technology that replaces them, and with our industrialization, such as cities, manufacturing plants, urbanization, recreational parks (such as golf courses, bars, clubs, fitness centers, stadiums, museums, universities, national parks, homes, condos, office buildings…etc.) We had to cut down a lot of trees, pave through nature and flush out these “pests” animals that serves us no use out of the way, because many of the things we built after destroying the natural forests were necessary and essential things that we needed as a society. We as a society needed more space so we had to get rid of the other space that the animals were using. Based on John Berger’s definition of “anthropomorphism” we as a human culture are more superior. As a society have history, knowledge, power, judgments, culture, intelligence (such as being able to travel into space… etc.), have an understanding of our world (such as recycling, reducing pollution, conserving natural resources (food, energy, products [“such as trees for example which produces paper, buildings, furniture, office supplies…”] preserving endangered species, evangelisms to third-world countries and providing them with food, shelter, education, medicine or medical treatments “for those people living in those countries that don’t have the resources in the third-world countries”, and helping them become self-sufficient, giving freedom to communistic countries with dictators…etc. ), many other things as well. This is what John Berger was meant in the reading when describing the word “Anthromorphism”. 

No comments:

Post a Comment